The effect of adding probiotics or prebiotic to the diet on the characteristics of local Iraqi goat carcasses and fat deposition

Authors

  • Maithem K. A. Al-Galiby Department of Animal production, College of agriculture and Marshes, University of Thi-Qar, 64001, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54174/54pwas38

Keywords:

Probiotics, Prebiotics, Diet supplementation, Carcass characteristics, Fat deposition

Abstract

The present study aimed to find out the effect of adding both the probiotics (3 g / kg feed) or the prebiotic (2 g / kg feed) to the local Iraqi kids diets on some characteristics of carcasses quantitative and qualitative traits. The study used 16 male kids who were evenly distributed over four treatments. The first treatment was fed 60% concentrated diet (included 20% wheat flour, 25% wheat bran, 20% corn, 7% soybeans, 3% salts and vitamins) with 40% alfalfa hay (control), while the remaining three groups were fed the same control diet in addition to 3 g probiotic/kg feed, 2 g prebiotic/kg feed or 1.5 probiotic + 1 gm prebiotic/ kg feed, respectively. The average weight of the kids was 18.90 kg at the start of the study and their average age was 4-5 months. The duration of the study was 105 days, including 15 days for adaptation. Diets were provided based on 3% of body weight. Kids were slaughtered and the carcasses cooled to 2 ° C for 24 hours. A range of measurements were made that included carcass characteristics, physical composition, muscle and bone distribution, and fat distribution pattern in the carcass. The results showed that the groups that were added to the probiotic diets significantly outperformed the control group in all measurements of carcass cuts. Both probiotic and prebiotic groups exceeded the control group in cold carcass weight, dressing percentage, fat layer thickness and eye muscle area. The three treatments also recorded the highest dressing compared to the control treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd El-Tawab, M. M., Youssef, I. M. I., Bakr, I. M. I. H. A., Fthenakis, G. C., & Giadinis, N. D. (2016). [Title of the article]. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 19(4), 893–906.

Arowolo, M. A., & He, J. (2018). Use of probiotics and botanical extracts to improve ruminant production in the tropics: A review. Animal Nutrition, 4(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2018.04.010

Badawy, S., Liu, Y., Guo, M., Liu, Z., Xie, C., Marawan, M. A., Ares, I., Lopez-Torres, B., Martínez, M., & Maximiliano, J.-E. (2023). Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) as a functional food: Is it beneficial or not? Food Research International, 172, 113158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113158

Cai, L., Yu, J., Hartanto, R., & Qi, D. (2021). Dietary supplementation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Clostridium butyricum and their combination ameliorate rumen fermentation and growth performance of heat-stressed goats. Animals, 11(7), 2116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11072116

Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple tests. Biometrics, 11, 1–42.

Estrada-Angulo, A., Zapata-Ramírez, O., Castro-Pérez, B. I., Urías-Estrada, J. D., Gaxiola-Camacho, S., Angulo-Montoya, C., Ríos-Rincón, F. G., Barreras, A., Zinn, R. A., Leyva-Morales, J. B., et al. (2021). The effects of single or combined supplementation of probiotics and prebiotics on growth performance, dietary energetics, carcass traits, and visceral mass in lambs finished under subtropical climate conditions. Biology, 10, 1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10111137

Jones, S. D. M., Burges, T. D., & Dupchak, K. (1983). Effect of dietary energy intake and sex on carcass tissue offal growth in sheep. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 63, 303–413.

Kruk, O., Ugnivenko, A., Antoniuk, T., Kolisnyk, O., Slobodyanyuk, N., Nosevych, D., Naumenko, T., & Gruntkovskyi, M. (2024). Evaluation of beef carcass quality using the muscle eye area M. longissimus dorsi. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 18, 619–632. https://doi.org/10.5219/1989

Lima, M. J. R., Teixeira Lemos, E., Oliveira, J., Teixeira Lemos, L. P., Monteiro, A. M. C., & Costa, J. M. (2018). Nutritional and health profile of goat products: Focus on health benefits of goat milk. [Journal/Publisher]. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.70321

Osman, A., Osafo, E. L. K., Attoh-Kotoku, V., Yunus, A., Anim-Jnr, A. S., Akwetey, W. Y., & Antwi, C. (2023). Carcass characteristics and meat quality of adult Sahelian does fed a basal diet of Brachiaria decumbens grass supplemented with probiotics and concentrates. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 9(1), 2225259. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2023.2225259

Ozer, C. O., & Kılıc, B. (2021). Optimization of pH, time, temperature, variety and concentration of the added fatty acid and the initial count of added lactic acid bacteria strains to improve microbial conjugated linoleic acid production in fermented ground beef. Meat Science, 171, 108303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108303

Singh, S. P., Jain, A., Roy, B., & Lakhani, G. (2016). Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus acidophilus as probiotics on performance of Barbari kids. Journal of Animal Research, 6(1), 135–138. https://doi.org/10.5958/2277-940X.2016.00022.X

SPSS. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. IBM Corp.

Stewart, S. M., Lauridsen, T., Toft, H., Pethick, D. W., Gardner, G. E., McGilchrist, P., & Christensen, M. (2021). Objective grading of eye muscle area, intramuscular fat and marbling in Australian beef and lamb. Meat Science, 181, 108358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108358

Wood, J. D., Giromin, C., & Givens, D. J. (2024). Animal-derived foods: Consumption, composition and effects on health and the environment: An overview. Frontiers in Animal Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2024.1332694

Downloads

Published

2024-12-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Maithem K. A. Al-Galiby. (2024). The effect of adding probiotics or prebiotic to the diet on the characteristics of local Iraqi goat carcasses and fat deposition. University of Thi-Qar Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(2), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.54174/54pwas38