Yield and Economic Analysis of Maize Production Using Different Combinations of Combined Tillage Machines and Comparison to Conventional Tillage Systems

  • Dakhil R. Ndawi
  • Aqeel J. Nassir
  • Sadiq J. Muhsin


The study was carried out at the agriculture college research station, University of Basrah, in the 2021 season. This research aimed to investigate the effect of five combinations of combined tillage machines on maize yield, fuel consumption, total cost, total return, and return and benefit-cost return. The economic indicators of combined tillage machines were compared with five conventional tillage systems. The combined tillage machines are The T1 combined tillage machine consists of a subsoiler operating at a depth of 60 cm, a chisel plow, a disk harrow, and a roller. T2 is similar to T1, except the subsoiler operates at a depth of 40 cm. A T3 combined tillage machine consists of a subsoiler operating at a depth of 60 cm and a chisel plow. T4 is similar to T3, except the subsoiler operates at a depth of 40 cm. A T5 combined tillage machine consists of a chisel plow and a disk harrow. The conventional tillage systems include M1, which consists of four passes (subsoiler at a depth of 60 cm + chisel plow + disk harrow + roller), M2 consists of four passes (subsoiler at a depth of 40 cm + chisel plow + disk harrow + roller), M3 consists of two passes (subsoiler at a depth of 60 cm + chisel plow), M4 consists of two passes (subsoiler at a depth of 40 cm + chisel plow ), M5 consists of two passes (chisel plow + disk harrow ). Each treatment was replicated three times, and the data were analyzed using a randomized complete block design in this experiment. The mean of the treatments for the combined tillage machines and conventional tillage systems were compared using the t-test at the probability level (0.01). The results of the combined tillage machines T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 comparison with conventional tillage systems M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5 revealed that the maize yield increased by 56.10 and 59.42, 56.48, 35.29, and 35.31% and saved fuel by 54.86 and 60.42, 36.77, 39.77, and 42.20% and decreased the total cost by 24.62, 24.70, 28.70, 27.61, and 16.50%. However, BCR was raised by 96.62, 101.28, 92.44, 68.35.20, and 57.2% respectively.  Soil tillage with combined tillage machines improved maize crop yield and fuel consumption.  


Afshar, R. K., and Dekamin, M. (2022). Sustainability assessment of corn production in conventional and conservation tillage systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 351, 131508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131508
Akbarnia, A., Farhani, F., and Heidary, B. (2013). Economic comparison of tillage and planting operations in three tillage systems. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 15(4), 180-184.‏
Almaliki, S. A., Himoud, M. S., & Muhsin, S. J. (2021). Mathematical Model for Evaluating Slippage of Tractor Under Various Field Conditions. Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 34, 49-59. https://doi.org/10.37077/25200860.2021.34.1.05
Apazhev, A. K., Fiapshev, A. G., Shekikhachev, I. A., Khazhmetov, L. M., Khazhmetova, A. L., and Ashabokov, K. K. (2019). Energy efficiency of improvement of agriculture optimization technology and machine complex optimization. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 124, p. 05054). EDP Sciences.‏ https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912405054
de Amorim, F. R., Patino, M. T. O., and Santos, D. F. L. (2022). Soil tillage and sugarcane planting: An assessment of cost and economic viability. Scientia Agricola, 79(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2019-0317
Fanigliulo, R., Pochi, D., and Servadio, P. (2021). Conv entional and conservation seedbed preparation systems for wheat planting in silty-clay soil. Sustainability, 13(11), 6506.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116506
Fernando, A.L., J. Costa, B. Barbosa, A. Monti and N. Rettenmaier. (2018). Environmental impact assessment of perennial crops cultivation on marginal soils in the Mediterranean Region. Biomass Bioenergy, 111: 174-186. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.04.005
Foster, A. D., and Rosenzweig, M. R. (2022). Are There Too Many Farms in the World? Labor Market Transaction Costs, Machine Capacities, and Optimal Farm Size. Journal of Political Economy, 130(3), 636-680.‏ https://doi.org/10.1086/717890
Kan, M., Partigoc, F., Gultekin, I., Arisoy, R. Z., Kaya, Y., Gultekin, S., and Taner, A. (2018). Economical aspects of conservation agriculture (Zero Tillage-Direct Seeding) system in Turkey. Fresenius Environ. Bull, 27(5), 3332-3341.‏
Kuhn, N. J., Hu, Y., Bloemertz, L., He, J., Li, H., and Greenwood, P. (2016). Conservation tillage and sustainable intensification of agriculture: regional vs. global benefit analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 216, 155-165.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.10.001
Lotfie, A. Y., Mohamed, H. D., and Haitham, R. E. R. (2013). Crop-machinery management system for field operations and farm machinery selection. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development, 5(5), 84-90.‏
Molenhuis, J. R. (2020). Budgeting Farm Machinery Costs. In Published by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Canada. 1-75.
Muhsin, S. J., Ramadhan, M. N., & Nassir, A. J. (2021, April). Effect of organic manure and tillage depths on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) production. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 735, No. 1, p. 012070). IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/735/1/012070
Nasr, G. E., Tayel, M. Y., Abdelhay, Y. B., Sabreen, K. P., and Dina, S. S. (2016). Technical evaluation of a new combined implement for seedbed preparation. International Journal of Chemical Technology Research, 9(05), 193–199.
Nassir, A. J., Ramadhan, M. N., & Alwan, A. A. M. (2021). Energy Input-Output Analysis in Wheat, Barley and Oat Production. Indian Journal of Ecology, 48(1), 304-307.‏
Nath, A., Malik, N., Singh, V. K., Shukla, A., and Chandra, R. (2020). Effect of different tillage and earthing up practices on growth and productivity of maize crop (Zea mays L.) in Tarai region of Uttarakhand. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(5), 2561-2565.‏
Noor, R. S., Hussain, F., and Umair, M. (2020 a). Evaluating selected soil physical properties under different soil tillage systems in arid southeast rawalpindi, pakistan. J. Clean WAS, 4, 41-45.‏
Noor, R. S., Hussain, F., Farooq, M. U., Abbas, I., Umair, M., Islam, M. A., and Sheraz, M. (2020 b). Yield and economic analysis of peanut production under different soil tillage systems in north-east region. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 33(3), 490-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2020/33.3.490.497 ‏
Oduma, O., Okeke, C. G., Umunna, M. F., Ehiomogue, P., and Orji, F. N. (2020) Effect of tillage operation on the physical and mechanical properties of soil in south–east Nigeria.‏ Futo Journal Series (FUTOJNLS). 6(2), 1-13
Prem, M., Swarnkar, R., Kantilal, V. D. K., Jeetsinh, P. S. K., and Chitharbhai, K. B. (2016). Combined tillage tools-a review. Current Agriculture Research Journal, 4(2), 179.‏
Revilla P, Alves ML, Andelković V, Balconi C, Dinis I, Mendes-Moreira P, Redaelli R, Ruiz de Galarreta JI, Vaz Patto MC, Žilić S, and Malvar RA. (2021) Traditional Foods from Maize (Zea mays L.) in Europe. Front Nutr. 7; 8:683399. doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.683399. PMID: 35071287; PMCID: PMC8780548.
Sarauskis, E., Buragiene, S., Masilionyte, L., Romaneckas, K., Avižienyte, D., and Sakalauskas, A. (2014). Energy balance, costs and CO2 analysis of tillage technologies in maize cultivation. Energy, 69, 227-235.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.090
Schultz, E., Chatterjee, A., DeSutter, T., and Franzen, D. (2017). Sodic soil reclamation potential of gypsum and biocharadditions: influence on physicochemical properties and soil respiration. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 48(15), 1792-1803.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2017.1395449
Shivran, H., Yadav, R. S., Singh, S. P., Godara, A. S., Bijarniya, A. L., and Samota, S. R. (2020). Tillage and weed management effect on productivity of wheat in North-West Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 52(2), 127-131. DOI: 10.5958/0974-8164.2017.00060.0
Siddiq, A., and AL-Obaidi, Y. Y. M. (2019). Evaluation of heavy chisel plow performance in different speeds in terms of some mechanical performance indicators. Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture, 47(1), 59-69.‏
Swain, S., Dash, A., Mohapatra, A., Das, D., Behera, D., Nayak, B., and Mohapatra, M. (2020). Effect of mechanization on cost-economics of maize cultivation by small farmers of Gajapati District, Odisha. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 8(4), 3103–3107. : https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4al.10126
Wang, Y. X., Chen, S. P., Zhang, D. X., Li, Y. A. N. G., Tao, C. U. I., Jing, H. R., and Li, Y. H. (2020). Effects of subsoiling depth, period interval and combined tillage practice on soil properties and yield in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(6), 1596-1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62681-X
Yadav, B., Krishnan, P., Parihar, C. M., and Yadav, S. (2020). Effect of conservation agriculture on soil hydro-physical properties under diversified maize (Zea mays)-based cropping systems. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 90(9), 1813-8.‏