Effect of CAPN1 gene polymorphism on some physical and sensory traits in broiler meat
Abstract
This study was conducted in the poultry field, Animal Production Department, College of Agriculture and Marshes, University of Thi-Qar, from 10/11/2021 to 3/2/2022, the period included field and laboratory stud. A total of 100, one day broilers Ross 308 were used. Laboratory analyzes were carried out in the laboratories of the Marshes Research Center, University of Thi-Qar and the laboratories of the College of Agriculture and Marshes, University of Thi-Qar. Three genotypes CC, CT and TT were identified whose frequency was 0.52, 0.34 and 0.14 respectively and the frequency of the C allele was 0.69 and the frequency of the T allele was 0.31. There were significant differences on Water Holding Capacity (WHC) among the genotypes, the CC genotype was superior to the CT and TT genotypes. As for the thawing and cooking loss, there were no significant differences between the genotypes. A significant differences on pH values among the genotypes, the CC genotype was superior to the CT and TT genotypes. Significant differences in flavor between genotypes, the CC genotype was superior to the CT genotype, and the CT genotype was superior to the TT genotype. Highly significant differences in tenderness, the CC genotype was superior to the TT genotype, while the CT genotype did not differ significantly from the CC and TT genotypes. Highly significant differences between the genotypes in juiciness, the CC genotype was superior to the CT and TT genotypes. No significant differences in color and general acceptable.
References
2. Al-Fayyad, Hamdi Abdel Aziz and Saad Abdel Hussein Naji. (1989). Poultry products technology. The first edition - Directorate of Higher Education Printing Press - Baghdad .
3. Al-Husseiny, K. S. J., & Khrebish, M. T. (2019). Determination of chemical content and some physical properties and meat pigments (myoglobin, meta myoglobin and oxymyoglobin) in different parts of slaughtered animals. Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 32(Spec. Issue 2), 302-319. https://doi.org/10.37077/25200860.2019.250
4. Abtahal Y.Anaas,Mohd.Nazmi Bin Abd.Manap.(2016). Association between single Nucleotide polymorphism of Calpain1 Gene and Meat Tenderness Traits in Different Genotypes of Chicken: Malaysian Native and Commercial Broiler Line.International Scholarly and Scientific Research &Innovation 10(2) 2016.
5. Babji, A.S., G.W. Froning and D.A. Ngoka . 1982 . The effect of preslaughter environmental temperature in the presence of electrolyte treatment on turkey meat quality. Poult. Sci., 61: 2385-2389.
6. Darwish, O. M. I., El-Geddawy, M. A. H., Khalifa, R. M. B., & Mohamed. R. A. A. (2012). Physico-chemical changes of frozen chicken burger formulated with some spices and herbs. Frontiers in Science, 2(6), 192-199. http://doi.org/10.5923/j.fs.20120206.10
7. FAO . 2016 . Food and Agriculture: Key to Achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. FAO, Rome.
8. Geesink, G.H., Koohmaraie, M., 1999. Effect of calpastatin on degradation of myofibrillar proteins by µ-calpain under postmortem conditions. J. Anim. Sci. 77, 2685–2692.
9. J. T. Shu, M. Zhang, Y. J. Shan et al., 2015. “Analysis of the genetic effects of CAPN1 gene polymorphisms on chickenmeat tenderness,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1393–1403.
10. Khalil, Maher Hassab Al-Nabi. (2007). Fundamentals of animal genetics and breeding. Qassim University, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Production and Breeding, Qassim University Press.
11. Levie, A. (1970). The meat hands book 1st ed. The AVI Publishing Co.
12. Connecticut, West Port..
13. Mcelroy, J.P., D.E. Harry, J.C.M. Dekkers and S.J. Lamont. 2002. Molecular Markers Associated with Growth and Carcass Traits in Meat-type Chickens. 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, August pp:19-23.
14. Molee, A., P. Kuadsantia, and P. Kaewnakian. 2018. Gene effects on body weight, carcass yield, and meat quality of Thai indigenouschicken. Jpn. Poult. Sci. 55:94–102.
15. Nam , J. ; Park , H.; Songa, C.K.; Kim , D. G.; Moon, Y.H. and Jung,I.C.(2000) Effect of freezing and re-freezing treatment on Chicken meat quality. Food Sci., 20: 222-229 .
16. Rasouli Z., S. Zerehdaran, M.A. Azari, and M.S. Shargh. 2013. Genetic polymorphism of the CAPN1 gene is associated with meat quality traits in Japanese quail. British poultry Science, vol. 54, No. 2, pp:171-175.
17. Rasmussein, A. L. and Mast, M. G. (1989). Effect of Feed with Drawal on Composition and Quality of Broiler Meat. Poultry Sci.68:1109-1113.
18. Saeed, Bakar Ali Haj. (2004). The use of electrical stimulation technology in tenderizing the meat of aged laying hens. PhD thesis - Department of Livestock - College of Agriculture - University of Baghdad.
19. Saxena, V.K., P. Singh., A.B. Pramod., K.A. Ahmed., M. Saxena and R.V. Singh 2005. Taq I PCR-RRFLP anlysis of myostatin gene revealed species sites in turkey and chicken. European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat Doorwerth. Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, INDIA-243 122.
20. Sahib, Maha, Salem Saleh Al-Tamimi, Mona Turki Al-Mousawi. (2009). A study of the physical characteristics of imported frozen chicken thighs, the Iraqi Journal of Market Research and Consumer Protection, Volume 1, No. 2.
21. Walker, P.; Rhubart-Berg, P.; McKenzie, S.; Kelling, K. and Lawrence,R.S. (2005). Public Health Implications of Meat Production and Consumption. Public Health Nutr., 8: 348-356.
1.png){kind=spacer}
